header-logo header-logo

09 October 2024
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public
printer mail-detail

Rethinking social care for disabled children

The Law Commission has proposed an overhaul of the ‘out of date’, ‘inaccessible’ and ‘potentially unfair’ law on provision for disabled children

Its 343-page consultation paper, ‘Disabled children’s social care’, published this week, covers the rules governing whether a disabled child can get help from social services to meet their needs, what help they can get, how they get it and how they may transition into adult social care. Typical help includes professional carers who visit the child at home, respite care, community activities or provision of special equipment. Alternatively, direct payments could be made so the parent can purchase these themselves.

Currently, under s 17 of the Children Act 1989, a disabled child is a child who is ‘blind, deaf or dumb or suffers from mental disorder of any kind or is substantially and permanently handicapped by illness, injury or congenital deformity’. The Law Commission points out this definition is from the 1940s and lags behind present-day understanding of autism and neurodiversity.

Moreover, current law is not only complicated but scattered throughout an array of Acts of Parliament, regulations, court decisions, government guidance and local authority policies. The Law Commission highlights that, since the law stipulates that local authorities provide the services required, whether a child’s needs are met or not depends on where they live.

The consultation paper poses questions on how disability should be defined, what remedies should be available when things go wrong, whether the current framework for care should be replaced, and whether there should be national eligibility criteria for disabled children’s social care.

Professor Alison Young, commissioner for public law, said: ‘The children who need help from social services have changed over time as our awareness and understanding of particular conditions has developed.’ 

The consultation closes on 20 January 2025.

Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll