header-logo header-logo

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Retirement under review

Employment

A review of the default retirement age (DRA) is to be brought forward to next year, as part of a government strategy to prepare for an ageing society.
The DRA review, originally scheduled for 2011, will look at ways to give people flexible retirement options. Currently, employers can require all staff to retire at 65 regardless of their circumstances. While the majority of people retire before 65, 1.3 million people choose to work beyond state pension age. However, Faith Dickson, partner at niche pension firm, Sacker & Partners, says: “It’s not impossible that removing the default retirement age entirely could discriminate against younger people trying to enter a difficult job market. Having a default retirement age also gives employers some certainty about managing their workforce. While you can’t disagree with the basic sentiment that people shouldn’t be written off as being too old to work, surely we must also give some importance to employers having certainty in managing their workforce, and allowing young people entry into the job market?

“Since pension schemes currently enjoy a number of exceptions from the general principles of the anti-age discrimination legislation, those of us in the pensions world can only hope that this doesn’t become the first in a long line of reviews of the exceptions that apply under the legislation.”

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll