header-logo header-logo

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Retirement under review

Employment

A review of the default retirement age (DRA) is to be brought forward to next year, as part of a government strategy to prepare for an ageing society.
The DRA review, originally scheduled for 2011, will look at ways to give people flexible retirement options. Currently, employers can require all staff to retire at 65 regardless of their circumstances. While the majority of people retire before 65, 1.3 million people choose to work beyond state pension age. However, Faith Dickson, partner at niche pension firm, Sacker & Partners, says: “It’s not impossible that removing the default retirement age entirely could discriminate against younger people trying to enter a difficult job market. Having a default retirement age also gives employers some certainty about managing their workforce. While you can’t disagree with the basic sentiment that people shouldn’t be written off as being too old to work, surely we must also give some importance to employers having certainty in managing their workforce, and allowing young people entry into the job market?

“Since pension schemes currently enjoy a number of exceptions from the general principles of the anti-age discrimination legislation, those of us in the pensions world can only hope that this doesn’t become the first in a long line of reviews of the exceptions that apply under the legislation.”

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll