header-logo header-logo

Retirement under review

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment

A review of the default retirement age (DRA) is to be brought forward to next year, as part of a government strategy to prepare for an ageing society.
The DRA review, originally scheduled for 2011, will look at ways to give people flexible retirement options. Currently, employers can require all staff to retire at 65 regardless of their circumstances. While the majority of people retire before 65, 1.3 million people choose to work beyond state pension age. However, Faith Dickson, partner at niche pension firm, Sacker & Partners, says: “It’s not impossible that removing the default retirement age entirely could discriminate against younger people trying to enter a difficult job market. Having a default retirement age also gives employers some certainty about managing their workforce. While you can’t disagree with the basic sentiment that people shouldn’t be written off as being too old to work, surely we must also give some importance to employers having certainty in managing their workforce, and allowing young people entry into the job market?

“Since pension schemes currently enjoy a number of exceptions from the general principles of the anti-age discrimination legislation, those of us in the pensions world can only hope that this doesn’t become the first in a long line of reviews of the exceptions that apply under the legislation.”

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll