header-logo header-logo

Return of mutuals in the public sector?

09 August 2018 / Martin Fone , Peter C. Young
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7805_young

Peter C. Young & Martin Fone discuss how risk mutuals can provide a cost-effective option for local authorities

  • The Local Government Association is developing a mutual on discretionary lines for its members. 
  • Traditional risk financing mutuals for local authorities in the UK stopped after a 2009 court case.
  • However, a closer look suggests they are permissable and could be an important risk management tool for local authorities.

For nearly 80 years almost all UK local authorities procured insurance through a risk mutual, Municipal Mutual Insurance Limited (MMI). Owing to several factors, Municipal Mutual ceased trading in 1992. In response, a commercial market emerged; one that proved to have chronic issues of unavailability, unaffordability, and unacceptable terms and conditions.

Partly in response to market instability, in April 2007 nine London Boroughs resurrected the mutual idea with the London Authorities’ Mutual Limited (LAML) and in August of that year nine Fire and Rescue Authorities followed suit, creating the Fire and Rescue Authorities’ Mutual Limited (FRAML).

LAML and FRAML were established

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll