header-logo header-logo

09 August 2018 / Martin Fone , Peter C. Young
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Return of mutuals in the public sector?

nlj_7805_young

Peter C. Young & Martin Fone discuss how risk mutuals can provide a cost-effective option for local authorities

  • The Local Government Association is developing a mutual on discretionary lines for its members. 
  • Traditional risk financing mutuals for local authorities in the UK stopped after a 2009 court case.
  • However, a closer look suggests they are permissable and could be an important risk management tool for local authorities.

For nearly 80 years almost all UK local authorities procured insurance through a risk mutual, Municipal Mutual Insurance Limited (MMI). Owing to several factors, Municipal Mutual ceased trading in 1992. In response, a commercial market emerged; one that proved to have chronic issues of unavailability, unaffordability, and unacceptable terms and conditions.

Partly in response to market instability, in April 2007 nine London Boroughs resurrected the mutual idea with the London Authorities’ Mutual Limited (LAML) and in August of that year nine Fire and Rescue Authorities followed suit, creating the Fire and Rescue Authorities’ Mutual Limited (FRAML).

LAML and FRAML were established

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll