header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / Maria Piggin
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Revenue Assistance

HMRC Production Orders have changed. Maria Piggin explains how

Prior to the changes effected by the Finance Act 2007, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) was required to use s 20BA of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970) for suspected serious fraud offences involving direct tax and para 11 of Sch 11 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994) for offences in connection with VAT, when applying for Production Orders.

 
Recent changes
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) (Application to Revenue and Customs) Order 2007enacted changes under the Finance Act 2007 which aligned HMRC’s  criminal investigation powers with those of other investigating authorities. Applications by HMRC for the production of “special procedure material” are now required to be made to a circuit judge under PACE 1984, Sch 1, para 4.
PACE 1984, Sch 1 contains a broad judicial discretion at para 16 to award costs. It states: “The costs of any application under this Schedule and of anything done or to be done in pursuance of an
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll