header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / Maria Piggin
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Revenue Assistance

HMRC Production Orders have changed. Maria Piggin explains how

Prior to the changes effected by the Finance Act 2007, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) was required to use s 20BA of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970) for suspected serious fraud offences involving direct tax and para 11 of Sch 11 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994) for offences in connection with VAT, when applying for Production Orders.

 
Recent changes
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) (Application to Revenue and Customs) Order 2007enacted changes under the Finance Act 2007 which aligned HMRC’s  criminal investigation powers with those of other investigating authorities. Applications by HMRC for the production of “special procedure material” are now required to be made to a circuit judge under PACE 1984, Sch 1, para 4.
PACE 1984, Sch 1 contains a broad judicial discretion at para 16 to award costs. It states: “The costs of any application under this Schedule and of anything done or to be done in pursuance of an
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll