header-logo header-logo

Revenue Assistance

22 January 2009 / Maria Piggin
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

HMRC Production Orders have changed. Maria Piggin explains how

Prior to the changes effected by the Finance Act 2007, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) was required to use s 20BA of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970) for suspected serious fraud offences involving direct tax and para 11 of Sch 11 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994) for offences in connection with VAT, when applying for Production Orders.

 
Recent changes
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) (Application to Revenue and Customs) Order 2007enacted changes under the Finance Act 2007 which aligned HMRC’s  criminal investigation powers with those of other investigating authorities. Applications by HMRC for the production of “special procedure material” are now required to be made to a circuit judge under PACE 1984, Sch 1, para 4.
PACE 1984, Sch 1 contains a broad judicial discretion at para 16 to award costs. It states: “The costs of any application under this Schedule and of anything done or to be done in pursuance of an order
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll