header-logo header-logo

06 January 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , George Hobson
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Environment , Property , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Reversal of fortune?

George Hobson & Malcolm Dowden report on solar vulnerability

The government’s appeal against the High Court’s pre-Christmas ruling regarding its flawed consultation on feed-in tariff (FiTs) reductions for solar installations leaves in doubt the rates available to property owners who failed to beat the 12 December 2011 deadline. However, even property owners who beat the deadline and retained the higher rates cannot entirely relax. As well as the risk of future policy reversals, solar installations remain vulnerable, given the current law on easements, to neighbouring development.

There is no right to receive unrestricted sunlight for conversion into renewable energy. Consequently, neighbouring development could obstruct the passage of sunlight to solar panels and reduce the energy produced by them. Lawyers attempting to protect solar installations may seek either new restrictive covenants or, in some cases, even leases of airspace over neighbouring sites. Either approach can be expensive, time-consuming and difficult to negotiate.

Rights of light?

The law on rights of light has its roots in the need for light

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll