header-logo header-logo

06 January 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , George Hobson
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Environment , Property , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Reversal of fortune?

George Hobson & Malcolm Dowden report on solar vulnerability

The government’s appeal against the High Court’s pre-Christmas ruling regarding its flawed consultation on feed-in tariff (FiTs) reductions for solar installations leaves in doubt the rates available to property owners who failed to beat the 12 December 2011 deadline. However, even property owners who beat the deadline and retained the higher rates cannot entirely relax. As well as the risk of future policy reversals, solar installations remain vulnerable, given the current law on easements, to neighbouring development.

There is no right to receive unrestricted sunlight for conversion into renewable energy. Consequently, neighbouring development could obstruct the passage of sunlight to solar panels and reduce the energy produced by them. Lawyers attempting to protect solar installations may seek either new restrictive covenants or, in some cases, even leases of airspace over neighbouring sites. Either approach can be expensive, time-consuming and difficult to negotiate.

Rights of light?

The law on rights of light has its roots in the need for light

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll