header-logo header-logo

Review of standard of proof for barristers' professional misconduct

04 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barristers accused of professional misconduct could be prosecuted with a lower standard of proof, under new regulatory proposals.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) published a consultation this week, R eview of the Standard of Proof Applied in Professional Misconduct Proceedings , proposing lowering the standard of proof at disciplinary hearings for professional misconduct from the current criminal standard of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ to the civil standard of ‘on the balance of probabilities’.

Switching to the civil standard would bring the Bar in line with the rest of the legal profession and most other professions—the BSB and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons are currently the only professional regulators applying the criminal standard. While the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal applies the criminal standard, it is not an approved regulator and considers itself bound by case law to continue applying the criminal standard.

The consultation closes on 21 July.

Issue: 7744 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll