header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Georgia Warren , Jeremy Drew
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Data protection , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Reviewing Gowers

Is the Gowers review destined to languish in a drawer? Jeremy Drew and Georgia Warren report

The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (the review) was launched with fanfare in December 2005. Gordon Brown announced that he had asked Andrew Gowers, previously editor of the Financial Times, to conduct an independent review of the UK intellectual property (IP) framework. No small task.

A very short two-month window was imposed for any submissions. A creditable 517 responses were received from a wide range of companies and organisations, from the obvious, to the less obvious such as the rock group Pink Floyd.

The detailed 141-page report was published in December 2006 and set out 54 recommendations to “deliver a robust intellectual property framework for the digital age” including tackling IP crime and reforming copyright law to allow uses consistent with the digital age.

Gowers stated early on that he did not think that the IP system was in need of a “radical overhaul”. While this may have been a disappointment to some, it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll