header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Georgia Warren , Jeremy Drew
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Data protection , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Reviewing Gowers

Is the Gowers review destined to languish in a drawer? Jeremy Drew and Georgia Warren report

The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (the review) was launched with fanfare in December 2005. Gordon Brown announced that he had asked Andrew Gowers, previously editor of the Financial Times, to conduct an independent review of the UK intellectual property (IP) framework. No small task.

A very short two-month window was imposed for any submissions. A creditable 517 responses were received from a wide range of companies and organisations, from the obvious, to the less obvious such as the rock group Pink Floyd.

The detailed 141-page report was published in December 2006 and set out 54 recommendations to “deliver a robust intellectual property framework for the digital age” including tackling IP crime and reforming copyright law to allow uses consistent with the digital age.

Gowers stated early on that he did not think that the IP system was in need of a “radical overhaul”. While this may have been a disappointment to some, it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll