header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Georgia Warren , Jeremy Drew
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Data protection , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Reviewing Gowers

Is the Gowers review destined to languish in a drawer? Jeremy Drew and Georgia Warren report

The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (the review) was launched with fanfare in December 2005. Gordon Brown announced that he had asked Andrew Gowers, previously editor of the Financial Times, to conduct an independent review of the UK intellectual property (IP) framework. No small task.

A very short two-month window was imposed for any submissions. A creditable 517 responses were received from a wide range of companies and organisations, from the obvious, to the less obvious such as the rock group Pink Floyd.

The detailed 141-page report was published in December 2006 and set out 54 recommendations to “deliver a robust intellectual property framework for the digital age” including tackling IP crime and reforming copyright law to allow uses consistent with the digital age.

Gowers stated early on that he did not think that the IP system was in need of a “radical overhaul”. While this may have been a disappointment to some, it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll