header-logo header-logo

13 August 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

RIAA Barker Gillette—Susan Humble

Firm makes senior partner appointment
RIAA Barker Gillette has announced the appointment of Susan Humble as a senior partner, strengthening its growing regulatory practice.


Susan brings a wealth of experience to the team, having previously been chief executive officer and clerk to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, a role she held for nearly eight years, and Head of the Secretariat, National Anti-Doping Panel at Sport Resolutions (UK). She is currently chair of the Board at the Taxation Disciplinary Board and a lay panellist of the Professional Conduct Panel at the Teaching Regulation Agency.

RIAA Barker Gillette’s regulatory team acts primarily for businesses and individuals across a wide range of industry sectors including healthcare, journalism, professional services, retail and sport.

Instructions have involved engagement with the British Horseracing Association, Civil Aviation Authority, Chartered Trading Standards Institute, Competition & Markets Authority, Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, Department of Trade and Industry, Football Association, Financial Conduct Authority, General Dental Council, General Medical Council, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales, Information Commissioner's Office and Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Commenting on her appointment, Susan said: ‘RIAA Barker Gillette is an ambitious firm acting for innovative businesses and individuals. Its regulatory services are in high demand, with clients attracted by our dynamic approach offering flexibility and high-level commercial advice. I am looking forward to returning to private practice, working alongside the RIAA Barker Gillette team as it continues to grow.’

Head of Department, Steven Barker, at RIAA Barker Gillette said: ‘The need for legal guidance and representation has become increasingly important for businesses and individuals operating in regulated sectors. I am delighted that Susan, with her wealth of experience and expertise in this area, has joined the team to work with our clients.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll