header-logo header-logo

Right end, wrong means

23 February 2012 / Richard Lang
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax
printer mail-detail

Richard Lang follows the winding path of the Yukos v Russia case

Hyped as the biggest claim ever submitted to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), in 2004 the oil giant Yukos took the Russian government to Strasbourg, alleging violations of its fair trial and property rights. This followed the initiation by the Russian Tax Ministry of litigation which lasted two years and which culminated in the bankruptcy and liquidation of the company in 2006. The ECtHR reached its decision on 20 September 2011 in OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v Russia (App No 14902/04).

Complicated hierarchy

The applicant, Yukos, was at the centre of a complicated hierarchy of parent companies and diverse subsidiaries. In particular, 22 “trading companies” had been set up in low-tax areas of Russia, which then “commissioned” Yukos to buy crude oil and sell it, either before or after processing, on their behalf. These companies then declared the tax on income received by Yukos.

The saga began on 14 April 2004 when the Tax Ministry, having

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll