header-logo header-logo

The right to justice & an agenda for change

06 October 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7764_hynes

Steve Hynes interviewed the former legal aid minister, Lord Bach (pictured), last month to discuss The Right to Justice , the final report from the Commission he chaired on access to justice policy

“The legislation we propose (The Right to Justice Act) will enshrine in statute the right to justice backed by an independent Justice Commission to enforce it.’ According to Bach the new Commission ‘would monitor how government departments work’ and act to prevent barriers to people being able to enforce their rights.

Aside from the new legislation the report calls for ‘urgent policy changes’ to address immediate crisis in the justice system. These include changes to eligibility criteria and broadening the scope of legal aid.

From 2008-10 Bach was the minister with responsibility for legal aid in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). In this post he says he realised how crucial access to early advice is to prevent legal problems escalating. Throughout the interview he would return to the theme of Social Welfare Law (SWL)—SWL is defined by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll