header-logo header-logo

On the right road? (Pt II)

08 February 2013 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Bevan continues his series on compensating RTA victims & finds our national law provision wanting

The terms, scope and workings of the UK government’s compensation guarantee has preoccupied legislators, the judiciary and legal practitioners alike since the first Road Traffic Act introduced in 1930 (RTA 1930). In the UK this provision has evolved over the years to produce four distinct compensatory safety nets. The first two consist of statutory rights. Between them, they confer on a victim a direct right to recover compensation from the defendant’s insurer and they are to be found within Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988). The third and fourth are delivered by a completely different route: through two extra-statutory compensation schemes devised specifically for victims of uninsured and unidentified drivers. The distinction between the two different types of scheme (statutory and extra-statutory) is relevant to the way one interprets them because different rules of construction are said to apply. This article concentrates on the first two statutory schemes.

The contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll