header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

On the right road? (Pt II)

Nicholas Bevan continues his series on compensating RTA victims & finds our national law provision wanting

The terms, scope and workings of the UK government’s compensation guarantee has preoccupied legislators, the judiciary and legal practitioners alike since the first Road Traffic Act introduced in 1930 (RTA 1930). In the UK this provision has evolved over the years to produce four distinct compensatory safety nets. The first two consist of statutory rights. Between them, they confer on a victim a direct right to recover compensation from the defendant’s insurer and they are to be found within Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988). The third and fourth are delivered by a completely different route: through two extra-statutory compensation schemes devised specifically for victims of uninsured and unidentified drivers. The distinction between the two different types of scheme (statutory and extra-statutory) is relevant to the way one interprets them because different rules of construction are said to apply. This article concentrates on the first two statutory schemes.

The contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll