header-logo header-logo

22 January 2025
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , International
printer mail-detail

Right to practise for UK & Swiss layers

The UK’s lawyers and other professionals will now find it easier to work in Switzerland, and vice versa, thanks to an agreement between the two countries.

The UK-Switzerland Recognition of Professional Qualifications (RPQ) Agreement, which applied to more than 200 professions, took effect this week. It includes a bespoke route to recognition for certain legal professionals, so lawyers can become qualified in the other country after practising for three years. The agreement safeguards the autonomy of UK and Swiss professional regulators to set and monitor standards.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘This agreement reflects the Law Society’s recommendations exactly.

‘It requires regulators to protect the right for UK solicitors to practise in Switzerland and Swiss lawyers to practise in the UK, ensuring they have a clear and permanent path to requalification. Switzerland is the second largest UK legal services export market in Europe and third largest globally.’

According to Office for National Statistics data published in October, the UK exported £302.79m in legal services to Switzerland in 2021. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll