header-logo header-logo

25 May 2016 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rights to fight

The right to privacy & family life versus the right to free expression: which is to prevail? Alec Samuels reports

The judge is often asked to order that certain matters or information should not be published; the media usually oppose the request. How is the judge to decide between the right to privacy and family life versus the right to free expression? Article 8 or Art 10? Certain propositions, arguable and rational, and supported by authority, are likely to be advanced by the parties: neither article has precedence, there is no hierarchy, the judge has to balance the competing claims.

There must be strong, even compelling, reasons for interfering with a convention right. The judge must bring an intensive focus to bear on the comparative importance of both rights.

Open justice is a fundamental principle in the court setting. The protection of children always ranks as a high priority.

Contemporary 

In contemporary society the judge is unlikely to order the suppression of the reporting of human relationships and affairs, especially of celebrities in the public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll