header-logo header-logo

25 May 2016 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rights to fight

The right to privacy & family life versus the right to free expression: which is to prevail? Alec Samuels reports

The judge is often asked to order that certain matters or information should not be published; the media usually oppose the request. How is the judge to decide between the right to privacy and family life versus the right to free expression? Article 8 or Art 10? Certain propositions, arguable and rational, and supported by authority, are likely to be advanced by the parties: neither article has precedence, there is no hierarchy, the judge has to balance the competing claims.

There must be strong, even compelling, reasons for interfering with a convention right. The judge must bring an intensive focus to bear on the comparative importance of both rights.

Open justice is a fundamental principle in the court setting. The protection of children always ranks as a high priority.

Contemporary 

In contemporary society the judge is unlikely to order the suppression of the reporting of human relationships and affairs, especially of celebrities in the public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll