header-logo header-logo

05 December 2014 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rights in focus

roger-smith

Human rights have been a popular talking point in recent times, says Roger Smith

Human rights emerged as a theme recently—by analogy for the Criminal Cases Review Commission, by appointment for a law centre stalwart, and in answers of the Lord Chief Justice.

Privatisation & Criminal Review

The Criminal Cases Review Commission held a rather successful annual conference at University College, London. Journalist David Rose, long steeped in miscarriage cases, proved a more than able replacement as chair for a late cancelling Mike Mansfield. His knowledge of, independence from, but basic support for, the commission provided a good framework for the day.

Presentation was assisted by the smooth communication skills of Richard Foster CBE, onetime head of the Crown Prosecution Service and now chair of the commission. Perhaps as a result, the conference was rather less fractious than previous events. This might also have been due to the notable quietness of some critics, notably Dr Michael Naughton, founder of INUK, the Innocence Network UK, and a vigorous campaigner on miscarriages of justice. INUK

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll