header-logo header-logo

Rights of retention

27 April 2018 / Kathryn Purkis , Kathryn Purkis
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7790_purkis

Kathryn Purkis analyses the transfer of trusteeship & what it means for the survival of a lien

  • Whether a right of retention exists as a general incident of the equitable lien that trustees enjoy as security for such liabilities.

A transfer of representation relating to a deceased estate in the course of administration might occur for a variety of reasons including on the: death of the personal representative; an application under s 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985; retraction of renunciation; or, even on the rare occasion of substitution under the Judicial Trustees Act 1896.

A transfer of trusteeship is more common, simply because a trust relationship will often endure longer than an estate administration; also, there are more jurisdictional bases for such a transfer, including out of court and by consent. In those cases, there is the opportunity for a contractual indemnity to be negotiated for liabilities which might subsequently crystallise, and it is usual to do so (other than on hostile removal). If adverse claims are immediately in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll