header-logo header-logo

Rights versus duty

12 July 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Public authorities should have a duty of care to parents as well as children in suspected child abuse cases, says Seamus Burns

The Lawrence family, including the father of Stephanie Lawrence’s children, came to the attention of Pembrokeshire County Council’s child protection team in 1999. In April 2002, following sporadic and inconclusive attention from various members of that team over the previous three years, the council had placed the children on the Child Protection Register as being at risk of physical and/or emotional harm from Mrs Lawrence and/or their father. They remained on the register for about 14 months before the council removed them from it in June 2003. In December 2004, the ombudsman had upheld a number of complaints from Mrs Lawrence of maladministration against the council, and furthermore had recommended that the council should pay her £5,000 in recognition of the distress and damage to her reputation and of the time and trouble in pursuing her complaints.

Mrs Lawrence then commenced proceedings against the council, alleging negligence and a violation of her right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll