header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008 / Mick Woodley
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Ringing in the new

Mick Woodley reports on the new model LPC

As a new academic year starts, many of the law schools and other providers which run the legal practice course (LPC) for prospective solicitors will be admitting students for the last time onto their present programmes. From September 2009 a new model is due to be launched and is set to revolutionise the vocational stage of solicitors' education and training and provide a platform for the work-based learning that is presently constituted by the training contract. All these changes are being championed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as the independent body responsible for regulating the solicitors' profession in England and Wales.
The new model

So how will the new LPC differ from its predecessor? Flexibility seems to be the key factor. The new LPC is to be offered generally in two separate stages which may be taken with different providers, but it seems that the delivery of these two stages may also exceptionally be combined. The existing written standards are to be replaced by a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll