header-logo header-logo

Riot Act "good news for insurers"

06 April 2017
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insurers will benefit from a new Riot Act, introduced in response to the 2011 London riots, lawyers say.

The Riot Compensation Act 2016 came into force on 6 April. It allows insurers to reclaim compensation from police authorities, allows uninsured individuals and businesses to claim compensation from police authorities, abolishes the right to consequential damages and introduces a compensation ceiling of £1m per claim.

Neil Beresford, partner at Clyde & Co, said the Act was “good news for insurers” as it clarified the rules on compensation and extended the scheme to motor vehicle damage.

“A key issue will remain how to identify when a riot has occurred,” he said. “This was one of the major problems in the 2011 London riots. The language in the Act has been simplified, with the definition of ‘riot’ now according with the criminal law as set out in s 1 of the Public Order Act 1986.”

Issue: 7741 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll