header-logo header-logo

Ripe for reform?

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

LTA 1954 is in dire need of statutory intervention says Malcolm Dowden

The Law Commission's trawls for redundant law occasionally result in Statute Law Repeal Acts, the most recent of which received royal assent in July 2008. However, caution prevails and that process is reserved for clearing away long defunct or quaintly anomalous statutes (such as the death penalty for impersonating a chelsea pensioner).

The process is far from agile, and statute enacted to meet one set of social or economic circumstances can rapidly become a poor fit. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) is one such example. LTA 1954 served a useful purpose in the years following World War II. By 1969 the original scheme was creaking, and a mechanism for contracting-out was needed. Recent reforms tweaked the procedure, but could not bring LTA 1954 into line with current market needs and conditions. Arguably, the time has come to reform the LTA 1954 so that it requires “contracting in” rather than “contracting out”, leaving the majority of landlords and tenants to work with contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll