header-logo header-logo

Ripe for reform?

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

LTA 1954 is in dire need of statutory intervention says Malcolm Dowden

The Law Commission's trawls for redundant law occasionally result in Statute Law Repeal Acts, the most recent of which received royal assent in July 2008. However, caution prevails and that process is reserved for clearing away long defunct or quaintly anomalous statutes (such as the death penalty for impersonating a chelsea pensioner).

The process is far from agile, and statute enacted to meet one set of social or economic circumstances can rapidly become a poor fit. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) is one such example. LTA 1954 served a useful purpose in the years following World War II. By 1969 the original scheme was creaking, and a mechanism for contracting-out was needed. Recent reforms tweaked the procedure, but could not bring LTA 1954 into line with current market needs and conditions. Arguably, the time has come to reform the LTA 1954 so that it requires “contracting in” rather than “contracting out”, leaving the majority of landlords and tenants to work with contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll