header-logo header-logo

12 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rise in intellectual property cases

Economic pressure leads to cut in product development & “borrowing” of competitor designs

More intellectual property (IP) disputes are reaching court as businesses fight to defend their profit margins and market share in the recession.
The number of IP cases launched in the High Court increased by a third in the last year, according to the latest judicial statistics.

In 2008, there were 562 IP cases in the High Court, compared to 422 in 2007, and 230 in 2006.

The majority of cases involved disputes with importers, wholesalers and retailers rather than overseas manufacturers. Claims relating to copyright and design right showed the highest jump of 66% from 172 in 2007 to 286 in 2008.

Mark Finn, intellectual property specialist at EMW Picton Howell, says: “The economic pressure has heightened the threat of IP infringement as companies look to cut product development costs by “borrowing” competitors’ designs.”

“Traditionally claims used to be made against manufacturers but an increasing number of IP cases are now being launched against importers, wholesalers and retailers.

With manufacturing moving to overseas countries like China and India, where the enforcement of foreign companies’ IP is generally poor, companies are finding it more effective to bring their claims against UK businesses which subsequently handle those goods.”

Finn expects to see further growth in IP cases involving telecoms: “The number of IP disputes in mobile telephony has exploded since the introduction of 3G technology.

“As mobile phones become ‘smarter’, they will incorporate more IP rights. This is likely to support a continued trend in IP litigation.”

Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll