header-logo header-logo

23 March 2018 / Ellis Pugh , Giselle Davies , Giselle Davies
Issue: 7786 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Risk management: avoiding the nuclear option

Giselle Davies & Ellis Pugh discuss how to handle liabilities outside your control

  • Defined benefit pension schemes can risk creating a funding deficit.
  • Avoiding insolvency is paramount.
  • Robust risk management is required to manage the issue.

While hidden liabilities come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, the fact that the sector is currently sitting on a very substantial pensions liability has been known for some time. A recent paper indicates that the top 40 charities in England and Wales have pension liabilities totaling £7bn. Clearly this is a problem, particularly where a charity’s pension liability compares unfavourably to its unrestricted reserve funds or annual income (the Hymans Robertson report suggests that for the 40 charities concerned the £7bn compares with £38bn of reserves and £12bn annual income respectively). For an individual charity, the comparison may be significantly less favourable.

Funding deficits: a ticking time bomb

It is defined benefit pension schemes (DBS), sometimes referred to as ‘final salary pensions’, which carry the risk of a funding deficit and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll