header-logo header-logo

Risk management: avoiding the nuclear option

23 March 2018 / Ellis Pugh , Giselle Davies , Giselle Davies
Issue: 7786 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Giselle Davies & Ellis Pugh discuss how to handle liabilities outside your control

  • Defined benefit pension schemes can risk creating a funding deficit.
  • Avoiding insolvency is paramount.
  • Robust risk management is required to manage the issue.

While hidden liabilities come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, the fact that the sector is currently sitting on a very substantial pensions liability has been known for some time. A recent paper indicates that the top 40 charities in England and Wales have pension liabilities totaling £7bn. Clearly this is a problem, particularly where a charity’s pension liability compares unfavourably to its unrestricted reserve funds or annual income (the Hymans Robertson report suggests that for the 40 charities concerned the £7bn compares with £38bn of reserves and £12bn annual income respectively). For an individual charity, the comparison may be significantly less favourable.

Funding deficits: a ticking time bomb

It is defined benefit pension schemes (DBS), sometimes referred to as ‘final salary pensions’, which carry the risk of a funding deficit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll