header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007 / Simon Young
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Risk management focus

MONEY LAUNDERING RULES >>
IDENTITY CHECKS >>
PEPS >>

Q. What’s all this about yet another change in the money laundering rules?

A. I warned you about this nearly a year ago. Draft regulations were issued then, and there has been a lot of controversy about them. We now have the final version, and the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157) will come into force on 15 December 2007. They will replace entirely the Money Laundering Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/3075).

Q. How on earth am I supposed to find out about them?

A. Well, it wouldn’t do you any harm to get hold of a copy of the regulations. More importantly, the Law Society has just released draft guidance for a brief consultation period, with the hope that it can be finalised before the new regulations come into force. They are also intending, this time round, to apply for Treasury approval, which would give the guidance more status before the courts. It can be downloaded from the society website (see www.lawsociety.org.uk).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll