header-logo header-logo

12 October 2011
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rock shares worthless

No compensation for Northern Rock shareholders

Former Northern Rock shareholders are not owed any compensation, the Upper Tribunal held last week.

After the failing bank was nationalised and its shares taken into public ownership in February 2008, the government set up a scheme to determine whether any compensation was due to shareholders. An independent valuer, Andrew Caldwell, assessed the shares as worthless if government assistance—£27bn in loans and £29bn in guarantees—were to be withdrawn.

A group of shareholders, led by hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, challenged the premise of the assessment, arguing it should have assumed a demand for repayment was made before nationalisation. The dispute centred on the correct interpretation of the valuation assumption in the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008, s 5(4)(a) that financial assistance from the Bank of England and the Treasury “has been withdrawn”.

However, the Upper Tribunal held the valuer’s interpretation was correct and that the nil valuation should stand, in Northern Rock Shareholders v Andrew Caldwell and HM Treasury [2011] UKUT 408 (TCC).

Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll