header-logo header-logo

12 October 2011
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rock shares worthless

No compensation for Northern Rock shareholders

Former Northern Rock shareholders are not owed any compensation, the Upper Tribunal held last week.

After the failing bank was nationalised and its shares taken into public ownership in February 2008, the government set up a scheme to determine whether any compensation was due to shareholders. An independent valuer, Andrew Caldwell, assessed the shares as worthless if government assistance—£27bn in loans and £29bn in guarantees—were to be withdrawn.

A group of shareholders, led by hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, challenged the premise of the assessment, arguing it should have assumed a demand for repayment was made before nationalisation. The dispute centred on the correct interpretation of the valuation assumption in the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008, s 5(4)(a) that financial assistance from the Bank of England and the Treasury “has been withdrawn”.

However, the Upper Tribunal held the valuer’s interpretation was correct and that the nil valuation should stand, in Northern Rock Shareholders v Andrew Caldwell and HM Treasury [2011] UKUT 408 (TCC).

Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll