header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Rogue lawyer warning

An unqualified lawyer has been held professionally negligent and ordered to pay his client £263,759 damages, plus £73,200 costs.

The High Court ruled that George Rusz and his firm Troy Lucas held themselves out as legal advisers to their client Paul Wright and therefore must be judged by the standard of a competent legal adviser. Wright suffered serious injuries from a negligent operation that left three plastic bags inside his body. Rusz ran his clinical negligence case, valuing the claim first at £1.1m then just under £3m, but without any supporting evidence.

Wright won his basic claim but was left with £73,200 costs against him.

Emma Jones, partner at Leigh Day, who acted for Wright in the professional negligence claim, said: ‘This is the first case on this issue since the ruling in Freeman v Marshall & Co [1966].’ She warned there has been ‘an increase in unregulated individuals who advertise their services’. 

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll