header-logo header-logo

09 September 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Rolling back justice (3)

Jon Robins anticipates the impact of legal aid reforms on family law

Earlier this year, a series of ordinary people gave testimony before a distinguished panel of non-lawyers in the Commons Committee Room 10 as part of the Commission of Inquiry into the case for legal aid. The idea behind the event, organised by the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers and the Young Legal Aid Lawyers, was to examine what kind of safety net our system of publicly-funded law provides for ordinary people.

One particularly memorable, but uncomfortable, testimony came from a young mother of two known as EP. She had successfully managed to extricate herself from an abusive relationship but it had taken years. EP told them how the child protection agencies intervened as a result of the couple’s spiraling addiction problems. “I was so miserable. I was just giving up on life. I did not have the energy or the will to try and sort myself out...Over the next year things were awful,” she related to the panel comprising the former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll