header-logo header-logo

Rolling back justice (3)

09 September 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Jon Robins anticipates the impact of legal aid reforms on family law

Earlier this year, a series of ordinary people gave testimony before a distinguished panel of non-lawyers in the Commons Committee Room 10 as part of the Commission of Inquiry into the case for legal aid. The idea behind the event, organised by the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers and the Young Legal Aid Lawyers, was to examine what kind of safety net our system of publicly-funded law provides for ordinary people.

One particularly memorable, but uncomfortable, testimony came from a young mother of two known as EP. She had successfully managed to extricate herself from an abusive relationship but it had taken years. EP told them how the child protection agencies intervened as a result of the couple’s spiraling addiction problems. “I was so miserable. I was just giving up on life. I did not have the energy or the will to try and sort myself out...Over the next year things were awful,” she related to the panel comprising the former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll