header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 October 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Rolling back justice (4)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

What will ABSs mean for legal aid firms? Jon Robins collects the views of those who are for & against deregulation

This week sees the start-date for the licensing of alternative business structures (ABSs), the most radical aspect of the Legal Services Act 2007, which allows for both the external ownership of law firms and the floating of legal practices on the stock exchange. But just what does this significant step towards deregulation of legal services mean for the publicly-funded end of the profession? Does it mean anything? The already precarious financial base of legal aid firms is about to be decimated by a government reform agenda predicated on the objective of removing £350m from a £2.1bn scheme. Ministers also want to slash fees for civil and family by 10% across the board.

Breath of fresh air?

Can ABSs breathe some life into a dying sector? A couple of years ago I asked Carolyn Regan, then chief executive of the Legal Services Commission, whether the Legal Services Act had anything

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll