header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 November 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Rolling back justice (5)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jon Robins reflects on the controversial Legal Aid Bill as it makes its way to the House of Lords

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill has had its final reading in the House of Commons. Frankly, there was no shortage of opportunities for MPs to play on the fact that the debate on this “Bill of Horrors” kicked off on All Hallow’s Eve, of all days. However, the Labour MP for Tooting, Sadiq Khan, began with a somewhat prematurely festive image calling the legislation “a Christmas tree Bill” with baubles “being added all the time”.

Festive farce?

The sprawling Legal Aid Bill has 120 clauses and 18 schedules. At the 11th hour—as the Christmas tree was “being cut down to be taken to the other place”, ie the House of Lords—Khan noted that yet “more baubles” were being hung upon its overstretched branches: 17 government new clauses, five new schedules and 84 amendments.

How would MPs do justice to all those huge concerns in the limited time set

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll