header-logo header-logo

Rolling back justice (6)

09 December 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Jon Robins signs off his series on life without legal aid

It was welcome to see the House of Lords putting the debate over the future of legal aid into the correct historical context blessed, as its members are, with memories longer than most of us. The veteran human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy—or Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws to give her full title—was one of several peers who invoked the legal aid scheme’s welfare state origins in an epic eight-hour plus debate over the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill. “It was [about] saying that the law is not just that the rich or for those who have money but for all of us,” she said. “That is what having a mature democracy is about.”

This is the last in the “Rolling back justice” series. It seems appropriate in a series of articles that contemplates a bleak and uncertain future for legal aid—despite the government pressing the pause button last week—to also consider the role that our publicly-funded system of law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll