header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 December 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Rolling back justice (6)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jon Robins signs off his series on life without legal aid

It was welcome to see the House of Lords putting the debate over the future of legal aid into the correct historical context blessed, as its members are, with memories longer than most of us. The veteran human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy—or Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws to give her full title—was one of several peers who invoked the legal aid scheme’s welfare state origins in an epic eight-hour plus debate over the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill. “It was [about] saying that the law is not just that the rich or for those who have money but for all of us,” she said. “That is what having a mature democracy is about.”

This is the last in the “Rolling back justice” series. It seems appropriate in a series of articles that contemplates a bleak and uncertain future for legal aid—despite the government pressing the pause button last week—to also consider the role that our publicly-funded system of law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridgestrengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll