header-logo header-logo

09 December 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Rolling back justice (6)

Jon Robins signs off his series on life without legal aid

It was welcome to see the House of Lords putting the debate over the future of legal aid into the correct historical context blessed, as its members are, with memories longer than most of us. The veteran human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy—or Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws to give her full title—was one of several peers who invoked the legal aid scheme’s welfare state origins in an epic eight-hour plus debate over the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill. “It was [about] saying that the law is not just that the rich or for those who have money but for all of us,” she said. “That is what having a mature democracy is about.”

This is the last in the “Rolling back justice” series. It seems appropriate in a series of articles that contemplates a bleak and uncertain future for legal aid—despite the government pressing the pause button last week—to also consider the role that our publicly-funded system of law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll