header-logo header-logo

The Rotherham question

19 September 2014 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
cover_rotherham

Where should the victims of the Rotherham abuse scandal seek compensation, asks Richard Scorer

Recent revelations about the sexual exploitation of 1,400 children in Rotherham have been truly shocking. But can the victims of these appalling crimes expect to receive compensation, and if so from whom?

Rotherham is one of several cases of child sexual exploitation to hit the headlines in the past two years. In all these cases the victims, typically girls aged 11 to 16, have been subjected to sexual exploitation by groups of men who use alcohol and drugs to lure them into abusive and violent relationships. Some of these men have now been convicted and further prosecutions are likely to follow. In many instances the victims have suffered extreme and potentially lifelong injury and damage, and as has been highlighted in media coverage, many currently lack any meaningful support to help with their ordeal. So it is unsurprising that many will look at the possibility of compensation.

Who to claim compensation from?

In theory, of course, the first target

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll