header-logo header-logo

The Rotherham question

19 September 2014 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
cover_rotherham

Where should the victims of the Rotherham abuse scandal seek compensation, asks Richard Scorer

Recent revelations about the sexual exploitation of 1,400 children in Rotherham have been truly shocking. But can the victims of these appalling crimes expect to receive compensation, and if so from whom?

Rotherham is one of several cases of child sexual exploitation to hit the headlines in the past two years. In all these cases the victims, typically girls aged 11 to 16, have been subjected to sexual exploitation by groups of men who use alcohol and drugs to lure them into abusive and violent relationships. Some of these men have now been convicted and further prosecutions are likely to follow. In many instances the victims have suffered extreme and potentially lifelong injury and damage, and as has been highlighted in media coverage, many currently lack any meaningful support to help with their ordeal. So it is unsurprising that many will look at the possibility of compensation.

Who to claim compensation from?

In theory, of course, the first target

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll