header-logo header-logo

The Rotherham question

19 September 2014 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
cover_rotherham

Where should the victims of the Rotherham abuse scandal seek compensation, asks Richard Scorer

Recent revelations about the sexual exploitation of 1,400 children in Rotherham have been truly shocking. But can the victims of these appalling crimes expect to receive compensation, and if so from whom?

Rotherham is one of several cases of child sexual exploitation to hit the headlines in the past two years. In all these cases the victims, typically girls aged 11 to 16, have been subjected to sexual exploitation by groups of men who use alcohol and drugs to lure them into abusive and violent relationships. Some of these men have now been convicted and further prosecutions are likely to follow. In many instances the victims have suffered extreme and potentially lifelong injury and damage, and as has been highlighted in media coverage, many currently lack any meaningful support to help with their ordeal. So it is unsurprising that many will look at the possibility of compensation.

Who to claim compensation from?

In theory, of course, the first target

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll