header-logo header-logo

Royal Commissions & criminal justice

03 March 2021 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
41391
Martin Rackstraw reflects on the role of Viscount Runciman & his colleagues in shaping the criminal justice landscape of today

This year sees the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the last Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. That commission was chaired by Viscount Runciman of Doxford, whose death was reported in December. As we wait for the establishment of the next Royal Commission, announced by the government in 2019, with a remit to ‘review the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice process’ it may be a good moment to look back at Viscount Runciman and his colleagues’ ‘Report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice’ to reflect on how they changed and shaped the criminal justice system into the one we have today.

The 1991 commission was established in the aftermath of a number of appalling miscarriages that had come to light in previous years. Its remit was a wide one: ‘…to examine the criminal justice system from the stage at which the police are investigating …right through

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll