header-logo header-logo

Royal Commissions & criminal justice

03 March 2021 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
41391
Martin Rackstraw reflects on the role of Viscount Runciman & his colleagues in shaping the criminal justice landscape of today

This year sees the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the last Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. That commission was chaired by Viscount Runciman of Doxford, whose death was reported in December. As we wait for the establishment of the next Royal Commission, announced by the government in 2019, with a remit to ‘review the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice process’ it may be a good moment to look back at Viscount Runciman and his colleagues’ ‘Report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice’ to reflect on how they changed and shaped the criminal justice system into the one we have today.

The 1991 commission was established in the aftermath of a number of appalling miscarriages that had come to light in previous years. Its remit was a wide one: ‘…to examine the criminal justice system from the stage at which the police are investigating …right through

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
back-to-top-scroll