header-logo header-logo

27 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

RTA portal plans hit the skids

Fenn report recommends a fuller review of the road traffic accident process

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to expand the role of the road traffic accident (RTA) portal for RTA claims need further review, according to government-commissioned research.

Next April, the MoJ is due to extend the portal to include all personal injury claims valued at less than £25,000, including employer and public liability cases.

Professor Paul Fenn, of Nottingham University, compared data from three claimant firms and two defendant insurers before and after the May 2010 introduction of the portal scheme for claims valued below £10,000.

He found an average six per cent reduction in damages awarded to injured claimants and a fall of three to four per cent in average costs awarded to claimant solicitors. There was a five to seven per cent rise in the speed of settlements, but half of all cases dropped out of the portal system altogether.

He recommended that the MoJ undertake a fuller, joint review of the RTA process and the fixed recoverable costs scheme.

Tom Jones, partner at Thompsons Solicitors, says the report shows there is “no justification” for extending the scheme, and accuses the government of being “hell-bent” on continuing with its plans.

The chief executive of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, Deborah Evans, says “the government must now stop and think rather than extend the portal in haste”.

Don Clarke, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL), says FOIL supports Prof Fenn’s call for a joint review.

However, he added: “We do not support the call for a delay of a further year.

“The report has been so delayed in its release that the timeframe has already expired, with the portal having been in operation now for more than two years. The government should move to fix and control costs as planned and there should be no further delays.”

An MoJ spokesperson says: “The government is reviewing fixed costs as part of its commitment to extend the RTA protocol and has undertaken an evidence-gathering exercise that has included a call for evidence and workshops with the major claimant personal injury solicitor law firms, insurers, and the Law Society, to examine some of the issues identified in Prof Fenn’s report.”

Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll