header-logo header-logo

27 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

RTA portal plans hit the skids

Fenn report recommends a fuller review of the road traffic accident process

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to expand the role of the road traffic accident (RTA) portal for RTA claims need further review, according to government-commissioned research.

Next April, the MoJ is due to extend the portal to include all personal injury claims valued at less than £25,000, including employer and public liability cases.

Professor Paul Fenn, of Nottingham University, compared data from three claimant firms and two defendant insurers before and after the May 2010 introduction of the portal scheme for claims valued below £10,000.

He found an average six per cent reduction in damages awarded to injured claimants and a fall of three to four per cent in average costs awarded to claimant solicitors. There was a five to seven per cent rise in the speed of settlements, but half of all cases dropped out of the portal system altogether.

He recommended that the MoJ undertake a fuller, joint review of the RTA process and the fixed recoverable costs scheme.

Tom Jones, partner at Thompsons Solicitors, says the report shows there is “no justification” for extending the scheme, and accuses the government of being “hell-bent” on continuing with its plans.

The chief executive of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, Deborah Evans, says “the government must now stop and think rather than extend the portal in haste”.

Don Clarke, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL), says FOIL supports Prof Fenn’s call for a joint review.

However, he added: “We do not support the call for a delay of a further year.

“The report has been so delayed in its release that the timeframe has already expired, with the portal having been in operation now for more than two years. The government should move to fix and control costs as planned and there should be no further delays.”

An MoJ spokesperson says: “The government is reviewing fixed costs as part of its commitment to extend the RTA protocol and has undertaken an evidence-gathering exercise that has included a call for evidence and workshops with the major claimant personal injury solicitor law firms, insurers, and the Law Society, to examine some of the issues identified in Prof Fenn’s report.”

Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

London restructuring team strengthened by legal director appointment

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll