header-logo header-logo

27 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

RTA portal plans hit the skids

Fenn report recommends a fuller review of the road traffic accident process

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to expand the role of the road traffic accident (RTA) portal for RTA claims need further review, according to government-commissioned research.

Next April, the MoJ is due to extend the portal to include all personal injury claims valued at less than £25,000, including employer and public liability cases.

Professor Paul Fenn, of Nottingham University, compared data from three claimant firms and two defendant insurers before and after the May 2010 introduction of the portal scheme for claims valued below £10,000.

He found an average six per cent reduction in damages awarded to injured claimants and a fall of three to four per cent in average costs awarded to claimant solicitors. There was a five to seven per cent rise in the speed of settlements, but half of all cases dropped out of the portal system altogether.

He recommended that the MoJ undertake a fuller, joint review of the RTA process and the fixed recoverable costs scheme.

Tom Jones, partner at Thompsons Solicitors, says the report shows there is “no justification” for extending the scheme, and accuses the government of being “hell-bent” on continuing with its plans.

The chief executive of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, Deborah Evans, says “the government must now stop and think rather than extend the portal in haste”.

Don Clarke, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL), says FOIL supports Prof Fenn’s call for a joint review.

However, he added: “We do not support the call for a delay of a further year.

“The report has been so delayed in its release that the timeframe has already expired, with the portal having been in operation now for more than two years. The government should move to fix and control costs as planned and there should be no further delays.”

An MoJ spokesperson says: “The government is reviewing fixed costs as part of its commitment to extend the RTA protocol and has undertaken an evidence-gathering exercise that has included a call for evidence and workshops with the major claimant personal injury solicitor law firms, insurers, and the Law Society, to examine some of the issues identified in Prof Fenn’s report.”

Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
back-to-top-scroll