header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Rule of law concerns

MPs have passed the controversial Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill despite concerns expressed by lawyers

The Bill was brought to circumvent the Supreme Court’s ruling that a government scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful as it is not a safe third country.

Nick Vineall KC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Bill contains some striking provisions.

‘Section 2(1) requires every decision maker (including the courts) to “conclusively” treat the Republic of Rwanda as a safe country, whether or not it is in fact safe. Section 3 disapplies some key provisions of the Human Rights Act. Happily, s 4 retains the right of the courts to consider whether Rwanda is a safe country for any particular individual.’

Vineall predicted legal challenges if the bill passed into law.

Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery said the bill would create a statutory duty that every decision maker must treat Rwanda as a safe country. Jeffery said parliament ‘cannot use law to change fact’.

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Rule of law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll