header-logo header-logo

Rule of law threat as US sanctions ICC judges

Lawyers have voiced support for judges and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court (ICC) subjected to US sanctions

The US imposed sanctions this week on two judges, Canada’s Kimberly Prost and France’s Nicolas Guillou, and two prosecutors, Fiji’s Nazhat Shameem Khan and Senegal’s Mame Mandiaye Niang, in response to the ICC issuing arrest warrants in November against Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, and to Judge Prost’s work on an investigation into US personnel in Afghanistan.

The ICC has also issued arrest warrants against three Hamas leaders who have since died.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘The sanctions against ICC legal professionals not only violate their rights but also threaten to undermine access to justice for victims of crimes under international law.

‘The legal profession upholds democracy and the rule of law—and when it is threatened, it is our duty to ensure that justice prevails. We stand with the ICC, fellow groups of legal professional bodies and lawyers’ rights organisations in condemnation of the US sanctions against ICC personnel, which represent a flagrant disregard for the rule of law and justice worldwide.’

The ICC’s oversight body, the Assembly of States Parties, condemned this week’s sanctions as ‘regrettable attempts to impede the Court and its personnel in the exercise of their independent judicial functions.

‘We continue to object to such unilateral measures firmly and unequivocally. They represent an affront to the independence of the Court and the integrity of the Rome Statute system…. In these challenging times, the international community must reaffirm its collective commitment to the rule of law and to ensuring that no one is above accountability’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll