header-logo header-logo

Rule of law threat as US sanctions ICC judges

Lawyers have voiced support for judges and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court (ICC) subjected to US sanctions

The US imposed sanctions this week on two judges, Canada’s Kimberly Prost and France’s Nicolas Guillou, and two prosecutors, Fiji’s Nazhat Shameem Khan and Senegal’s Mame Mandiaye Niang, in response to the ICC issuing arrest warrants in November against Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, and to Judge Prost’s work on an investigation into US personnel in Afghanistan.

The ICC has also issued arrest warrants against three Hamas leaders who have since died.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘The sanctions against ICC legal professionals not only violate their rights but also threaten to undermine access to justice for victims of crimes under international law.

‘The legal profession upholds democracy and the rule of law—and when it is threatened, it is our duty to ensure that justice prevails. We stand with the ICC, fellow groups of legal professional bodies and lawyers’ rights organisations in condemnation of the US sanctions against ICC personnel, which represent a flagrant disregard for the rule of law and justice worldwide.’

The ICC’s oversight body, the Assembly of States Parties, condemned this week’s sanctions as ‘regrettable attempts to impede the Court and its personnel in the exercise of their independent judicial functions.

‘We continue to object to such unilateral measures firmly and unequivocally. They represent an affront to the independence of the Court and the integrity of the Rome Statute system…. In these challenging times, the international community must reaffirm its collective commitment to the rule of law and to ensuring that no one is above accountability’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll