header-logo header-logo

Rule of law threat as US sanctions ICC judges

Lawyers have voiced support for judges and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court (ICC) subjected to US sanctions

The US imposed sanctions this week on two judges, Canada’s Kimberly Prost and France’s Nicolas Guillou, and two prosecutors, Fiji’s Nazhat Shameem Khan and Senegal’s Mame Mandiaye Niang, in response to the ICC issuing arrest warrants in November against Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant, and to Judge Prost’s work on an investigation into US personnel in Afghanistan.

The ICC has also issued arrest warrants against three Hamas leaders who have since died.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘The sanctions against ICC legal professionals not only violate their rights but also threaten to undermine access to justice for victims of crimes under international law.

‘The legal profession upholds democracy and the rule of law—and when it is threatened, it is our duty to ensure that justice prevails. We stand with the ICC, fellow groups of legal professional bodies and lawyers’ rights organisations in condemnation of the US sanctions against ICC personnel, which represent a flagrant disregard for the rule of law and justice worldwide.’

The ICC’s oversight body, the Assembly of States Parties, condemned this week’s sanctions as ‘regrettable attempts to impede the Court and its personnel in the exercise of their independent judicial functions.

‘We continue to object to such unilateral measures firmly and unequivocally. They represent an affront to the independence of the Court and the integrity of the Rome Statute system…. In these challenging times, the international community must reaffirm its collective commitment to the rule of law and to ensuring that no one is above accountability’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll