header-logo header-logo

29 November 2024 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8096 / Categories: Opinion , Rule of law , International
printer mail-detail

Rule of law: words are not enough

199239
It does proponents of the rule of law no harm to admit to its many uncertainties: Roger Smith warns against the temptation to oversimplify

In October, Lord Richard Hermer KC, the Attorney General, gave the 2024 Bingham Lecture entitled ‘The Rule of Law in an Age of Populism’. Speeches praising the rule of law, with nuanced differences of definition, are somewhat of a rite of passage for attorney generals. It is barely more than a year since Victoria Prentis KC was treading the boards on the same topic, albeit with a different angle.

Restoration & resilience

Lord Hermer’s particular take was the need for ‘restoration of our reputation as a country that upholds the rule of law at every turn and… embedding resilience to rebuff the populist challenge’. The challenges of the modern world are, he argued, ‘increasingly global’ and ‘we need a functioning global order, underpinned by a strong commitment to the rule of law, to even begin to tackle them.’ Such an order, at home and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll