header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ruling ends legal limbo

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of pleural plaques victims north of the border

In a landmark judgment, AXA General Insurance v the Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, the justices held the Scottish Parliament was within its rights to pass a new law restoring pleural plaques victims’ right to compensation. They rejected insurers’ argument that the new law breached their human rights.

The new law was passed following the controversial 2007 decision of the House of Lords that the condition was harmless (Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39).

Patrick McGuire, partner at Thompsons Solicitors, which handles 90% of Scottish pleural plaques cases, said: “This is a great day for democracy because the Supreme Court has reinforced the Scottish Parliament’s right to legislate to protect the rights of its citizens.

“This verdict means that 1,200 Scottish pleural plaques victims, some of whom have been in legal limbo for five or six years, can now pursue their cases through courts. And we believe their claims will succeed.”

Laura Blane, Thompsons partner and asbestos specialist, said: “We have 650 pleural plaques cases on hold in the courts and another 450 coming through the system.”

Susan Brown, director at Prolegal, said: “This is good news for Scottish asbestos victims and restores them to the position the whole country was in prior to the judgment of the House of Lords in Rothwell.”

Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll