header-logo header-logo

Ruling ends legal limbo

20 October 2011
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of pleural plaques victims north of the border

In a landmark judgment, AXA General Insurance v the Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, the justices held the Scottish Parliament was within its rights to pass a new law restoring pleural plaques victims’ right to compensation. They rejected insurers’ argument that the new law breached their human rights.

The new law was passed following the controversial 2007 decision of the House of Lords that the condition was harmless (Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39).

Patrick McGuire, partner at Thompsons Solicitors, which handles 90% of Scottish pleural plaques cases, said: “This is a great day for democracy because the Supreme Court has reinforced the Scottish Parliament’s right to legislate to protect the rights of its citizens.

“This verdict means that 1,200 Scottish pleural plaques victims, some of whom have been in legal limbo for five or six years, can now pursue their cases through courts. And we believe their claims will succeed.”

Laura Blane, Thompsons partner and asbestos specialist, said: “We have 650 pleural plaques cases on hold in the courts and another 450 coming through the system.”

Susan Brown, director at Prolegal, said: “This is good news for Scottish asbestos victims and restores them to the position the whole country was in prior to the judgment of the House of Lords in Rothwell.”

Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll