header-logo header-logo

26 October 2017
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Insurance surgery , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Ruling equips claimants with new right of action

nlj_7767_cover

The European Court of Justice ruling in Farrell v Whitty (C-413/15), this month, fixes the Motor Insurance Bureau (MIB) with a completely new liability to compensate motor accident victims aff ected by the government’s longstanding failure to implement the European Motor Insurance Directives (the Directives) properly, according to insurance expert Dr Nicholas Bevan.

Bevan, a solicitor, said: ‘In Farrell the court ruled that the Irish compensating body, MIB of Ireland, was subject to the direct eff ect of the Directives. This means that it is now liable to compensate victims of vehicles that are uninsured in circumstances wrongly excluded from compulsory insurance in Ireland. The MIB was set up in almost identical circumstances.

‘Hitherto it was settled law that the MIB was not an emanation of the state and thus not vicariously liable for the government’s legislative shortcomings in this way.’

Bevan continued: ‘Farrell is the most important ruling on state liability for over a quarter century. Its impact extends beyond the Motor Insurance Directives it addresses. Its effect is to extend the range of organisations that are capable of being pinned with a direct liability to compensate individuals adversely aff ected by a state’s failure to implement a Directive. It equips claimants with a new right of action grounded in EU law.’ (State liability: betwixt & between Brexit)

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll