header-logo header-logo

04 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Rupert Reed QC—Serle Court

rupert_reed

Chambers welcomes top Commercial Silk

Serle Court has announced that Rupert Reed QC has joined from Wilberforce Chambers. 

Rupert is a top Commercial Chancery Silk with an exceptional reputation and his arrival at Serle Court further emphasises the set’s continuing market lead in this area. Rupert was called to the Bar in 1996 and took Silk in 2014 having been “Chancery Junior of the Year” in 2013. With 20 years’ experience, he has been involved in many leading Chancery and Commercial cases including Equitable Life and Berezovsky. His practice today covers most aspects of Commercial and Chancery dispute resolution, with an emphasis on contracts of property investment, finance, development and management, as well as wider fraud, banking and shareholder disputes. 

His practice in England is primarily in the Commercial Court and Chancery Division of the High Court and the Court of Appeal, but he brings a strong offshore practice including significant work in the Courts of the Dubai International Finance Centre (DIFC). Much of his recent work there has been in the enforcement in the DIFC Courts of international arbitral awards and foreign judgments. He led the Claimant’s Counsel team to trial in one of most significant fraud cases in the DIFC Courts, Corinth Pipeworks SA v Barclays Bank plc

John Petrie, chief executive of Serle Court said: “We are delighted to welcome Rupert to Serle Court. He has a stellar reputation in the Commercial Chancery field both in the UK and offshore, which fits perfectly with Serle Court’s core practice areas. His arrival further demonstrates that the reputation of Serle Court in the Commercial Chancery field attracts the best practitioners.” 

Rupert commented: “I am thrilled to be joining a set with a strong Commercial Chancery focus, a global reputation for both its international and its domestic work, and so many of my closest friends at the Commercial Chancery Bar. I look forward to exploring the obvious synergies between my existing practice and the core areas of commercial, trusts and property practice at Serle Court.” 

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll