header-logo header-logo

Rwanda plans suffer further defeat in Lords

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail
Peers have inflicted a series of defeats on the Illegal Migration Bill, in a further setback for the government following the Court of Appeal’s ruling that its plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing were unlawful.

The Bill gives the Home Office powers to detain and remove those who arrive in the UK without permission to their home country or to a third country such as Rwanda.

Peers voted to compel the home secretary to consider asylum claims from unauthorised routes if they have not been removed within six months, and to protect LGBTQ+ people against removal to inappropriate countries, including Rwanda.

They voted against plans to relax the current 24-hour limit on detention of unaccompanied migrant children, the 72-hour limit on detention of accompanied children (or one week with ministerial approval), and the 72-hour limit on the detention of pregnant women.

Last week, the Lords voted against plans to backdate deportations to 7 March, and for modern slavery safeguards and asylum help for unaccompanied children to be included in the Bill.

AAA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 745, handed down last week, concerned Home Office plans to send ten asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing. They were from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Vietnam, Sudan and Albania, and arrived in the UK in small boats from France.

Granting the appeal, Lord Burnett, Sir Geoffrey Vos and Lord Justice Underhill, in a lengthy 161-page judgment, found there was a ‘real risk’ the asylum claims could be wrongly refused and ‘real risk’ of refoulement.

Ben Keith, barrister at 5 St Andrew’s Hill, said: ‘The court found there were fundamental problems with the Rwandan asylum system which could not be glossed over by the memorandum of understanding.

‘They also commented that there remain concerns about Rwanda’s use of torture and repression of dissent but did not finally determine the point.’

Welcoming the decision, Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the ruling provided further evidence the government’s Illegal Migration Bill is ‘fatally flawed’.

Shuja said: ‘The government has only secured one removals agreement, which is with Rwanda, that has now been ruled unlawful.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll