header-logo header-logo

Rwanda plans suffer further defeat in Lords

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail
Peers have inflicted a series of defeats on the Illegal Migration Bill, in a further setback for the government following the Court of Appeal’s ruling that its plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing were unlawful.

The Bill gives the Home Office powers to detain and remove those who arrive in the UK without permission to their home country or to a third country such as Rwanda.

Peers voted to compel the home secretary to consider asylum claims from unauthorised routes if they have not been removed within six months, and to protect LGBTQ+ people against removal to inappropriate countries, including Rwanda.

They voted against plans to relax the current 24-hour limit on detention of unaccompanied migrant children, the 72-hour limit on detention of accompanied children (or one week with ministerial approval), and the 72-hour limit on the detention of pregnant women.

Last week, the Lords voted against plans to backdate deportations to 7 March, and for modern slavery safeguards and asylum help for unaccompanied children to be included in the Bill.

AAA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 745, handed down last week, concerned Home Office plans to send ten asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing. They were from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Vietnam, Sudan and Albania, and arrived in the UK in small boats from France.

Granting the appeal, Lord Burnett, Sir Geoffrey Vos and Lord Justice Underhill, in a lengthy 161-page judgment, found there was a ‘real risk’ the asylum claims could be wrongly refused and ‘real risk’ of refoulement.

Ben Keith, barrister at 5 St Andrew’s Hill, said: ‘The court found there were fundamental problems with the Rwandan asylum system which could not be glossed over by the memorandum of understanding.

‘They also commented that there remain concerns about Rwanda’s use of torture and repression of dissent but did not finally determine the point.’

Welcoming the decision, Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the ruling provided further evidence the government’s Illegal Migration Bill is ‘fatally flawed’.

Shuja said: ‘The government has only secured one removals agreement, which is with Rwanda, that has now been ruled unlawful.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Cripps—Simon Main

Cripps—Simon Main

Firm strengthens residential property team with partner hire

Hugh James—Danielle Cahill

Hugh James—Danielle Cahill

Private wealth disputes team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar 2025 and joint head of chambers at 4PB, sets out in this week's NLJ how the profession will respond to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s review into bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct at the Bar
In a very special tribute in this week's NLJ, David Burrows reflects on the retirement of Patrick Allen, co-founder of Hodge Jones & Allen, whose career epitomised the heyday of legal aid
back-to-top-scroll