header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

SAFE HAVEN

In brief

In deciding whether it would be unduly harsh to expect an asylum seeker to relocate to a safe haven in another part of his country, consideration of conditions in the place of habitual residence does not have to be the starting point of the assessment, the House of Lords has ruled. In AH and others (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the law lords held that it was for the decision-maker to decide what weight should be given to that point, and all other relevant factors, in the context of the facts of the case. The case overturns a Court of Appeal ruling which allowed an appeal by AH, IG and NM against the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal ordering their return to Sudan.

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll