header-logo header-logo

04 May 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Safeguarding matters

nlj_7791_dobson

Reilly v Sandwell: paying the price for the wrongfulness of non-disclosure. By Nicholas Dobson

  • A headteacher who failed to disclose to her employer her relationship with a convicted child sex offender was fairly dismissed.

A primary school headteacher who failed to inform her governing body of a non-sexual relationship with a convicted child sex offender was found to have been fairly dismissed. So decided the Supreme Court unanimously on 14 March 2018. The case in question was Reilly v Sandwell MBC [2018] UKSC 16, [2018] All ER (D) 82 (Mar) in which Lord Wilson gave the lead judgment. Lords Carnwath, Hughes and Hodge agreed and Lady Hale delivered a concurring decision.

A close friendship

Miss Reilly, the appellant (who prior to her dismissal had had an exemplary disciplinary record) had a close platonic friendship with a Mr Selwood. They bought a property in joint names as an investment and also set up a joint bank account out of which to pay the mortgage instalments. Although they did not live together, the appellant occasionally stayed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll