header-logo header-logo

Salary rise to attract more judges

06 June 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
High Court judges have been given a 25% pay boost, and circuit and tribunal judges a 15% boost in a bid to stem a recruitment crisis

The 25% will replace the 11% temporary recruitment and retention allowance introduced for High Court judges in 2017, bringing their annual salary to £188,901 from 1 October. Circuit and tribunal judge salaries will rise to £140,289. These figures include a permanent 2% salary rise given to all judges.

Both the permanent salary rise and the temporary allowance will be backdated to 1 April 2019.

The allowance will only be given to eligible judges – those eligible for a new, less valuable pension scheme introduced in 2015, which is being challenged in the courts on the grounds of age discrimination (Lord Chancellor v McCloud and Mostyn & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2844). It will be retained only until the McCloud litigation is complete, and will be taxable, non-pensionable and non-consolidated.

There has been a shortage of judges in recent years due to early retirements and promotions, with ‘serious impacts across all jurisdictions’, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said. Care proceedings determining the future for children, for example, took on average 31 weeks instead of the statutory target of 26 weeks last year.

However, three successive recruitment exercises for High Court positions have failed to fill all available vacancies, with 14 posts unfilled last October and more vacancies due to arise this year. The MoJ also reports emerging recruitment problems for District Judge and First-Tier Tribunal Judge posts, particularly in specialist areas.

The allowance falls short of the Senior Salaries Review Body’s recommendations of 32% for High Court judges, 22% for Circuit and Upper Tribunal judges, and 8% for District and First-tier Tribunal judges.

Lord Chancellor David Gauke said: ‘Here in the UK, we have a judiciary that is world-renowned because of its quality, independence and integrity.

‘Every day our judges take decisions which have a profound impact on people’s lives.’

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, and Sir Ernest Ryder, Senior President of Tribunals, said the salaries announcement was ‘an important step which we are confident will have a significant effect on addressing critical shortages in the judiciary.

‘Judges understand very well how delays to the cases they decide can affect the people and businesses involved.  They do their utmost to ensure cases are dealt with both promptly and fairly, but are nonetheless concerned that there is an urgent need to recruit enough judges to tackle the workload in a sustainable way.

‘Judges are conscious that they are well-paid compared to most in the public-sector. They are continually finding ways to make the administration of justice more efficient both through the modernisation programme being run by HMCTS and more widely.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll