header-logo header-logo

06 June 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Salary rise to attract more judges

High Court judges have been given a 25% pay boost, and circuit and tribunal judges a 15% boost in a bid to stem a recruitment crisis

The 25% will replace the 11% temporary recruitment and retention allowance introduced for High Court judges in 2017, bringing their annual salary to £188,901 from 1 October. Circuit and tribunal judge salaries will rise to £140,289. These figures include a permanent 2% salary rise given to all judges.

Both the permanent salary rise and the temporary allowance will be backdated to 1 April 2019.

The allowance will only be given to eligible judges – those eligible for a new, less valuable pension scheme introduced in 2015, which is being challenged in the courts on the grounds of age discrimination (Lord Chancellor v McCloud and Mostyn & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2844). It will be retained only until the McCloud litigation is complete, and will be taxable, non-pensionable and non-consolidated.

There has been a shortage of judges in recent years due to early retirements and promotions, with ‘serious impacts across all jurisdictions’, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said. Care proceedings determining the future for children, for example, took on average 31 weeks instead of the statutory target of 26 weeks last year.

However, three successive recruitment exercises for High Court positions have failed to fill all available vacancies, with 14 posts unfilled last October and more vacancies due to arise this year. The MoJ also reports emerging recruitment problems for District Judge and First-Tier Tribunal Judge posts, particularly in specialist areas.

The allowance falls short of the Senior Salaries Review Body’s recommendations of 32% for High Court judges, 22% for Circuit and Upper Tribunal judges, and 8% for District and First-tier Tribunal judges.

Lord Chancellor David Gauke said: ‘Here in the UK, we have a judiciary that is world-renowned because of its quality, independence and integrity.

‘Every day our judges take decisions which have a profound impact on people’s lives.’

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, and Sir Ernest Ryder, Senior President of Tribunals, said the salaries announcement was ‘an important step which we are confident will have a significant effect on addressing critical shortages in the judiciary.

‘Judges understand very well how delays to the cases they decide can affect the people and businesses involved.  They do their utmost to ensure cases are dealt with both promptly and fairly, but are nonetheless concerned that there is an urgent need to recruit enough judges to tackle the workload in a sustainable way.

‘Judges are conscious that they are well-paid compared to most in the public-sector. They are continually finding ways to make the administration of justice more efficient both through the modernisation programme being run by HMCTS and more widely.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll