header-logo header-logo

04 October 2024 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Features , Sports law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Salomon & the Olympic cyclist

191511
Michael L Nash muses on sports, advertising & the survival against the odds of Salomon boots

In Whitechapel in 1892, an enterprising Jewish emigrant, Aron Salomon, founded the iconic name of Salomon. It quickly became a byword for boots, shoes and all kinds of footwear. The company proved so successful that Salomon’s sons wanted a part of it during their father’s lifetime, and so what had begun as a sole trader metamorphosed into a registered company. Naturally this company had shareholders, but only a very few, namely Salomon himself, his wife, and the five eldest of his many children, sons as well as daughters. When it became a company, the shareholders paid over the odds for their shares, much more than the company was worth, and this extended to other contacts of Salomon, including one who, encouraged to invest, did so to the tune of £5,000 (a huge sum in 1892) protected by a floating charge.

Unfortunately, there was a dip in the market and the company became bankrupt. Creditors

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll