header-logo header-logo

Salomon & the Olympic cyclist

04 October 2024 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Features , Sports law , Commercial
printer mail-detail
191511
Michael L Nash muses on sports, advertising & the survival against the odds of Salomon boots

In Whitechapel in 1892, an enterprising Jewish emigrant, Aron Salomon, founded the iconic name of Salomon. It quickly became a byword for boots, shoes and all kinds of footwear. The company proved so successful that Salomon’s sons wanted a part of it during their father’s lifetime, and so what had begun as a sole trader metamorphosed into a registered company. Naturally this company had shareholders, but only a very few, namely Salomon himself, his wife, and the five eldest of his many children, sons as well as daughters. When it became a company, the shareholders paid over the odds for their shares, much more than the company was worth, and this extended to other contacts of Salomon, including one who, encouraged to invest, did so to the tune of £5,000 (a huge sum in 1892) protected by a floating charge.

Unfortunately, there was a dip in the market and the company became bankrupt. Creditors lined

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll