header-logo header-logo

27 May 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The same but different

nlj_7700_aamondt

Do the government proposals for future-proofing the BBC lack vision? Athelstane Aamodt reviews the evidence

So it’s finally here: the government has published its white paper on the renewal of the BBC’s Royal Charter, entitled A BBC For The Future: A Broadcaster Of Distinction. It’s big, coming in at 136 (bafflingly, unnumbered) pages, rather more than its predecessor, the 2006 White Paper A Public Service For All: The BBC In The Digital Age, which was almost half the length at 76 pages.

The main points of the white paper are:

  • the licence fee remains intact, and will increase in line with inflation;
  • a new “unitary board” is proposed that would replace the BBC Trust and the BBC Executive;
  • the BBC’s content commissioning will be opened up to greater competition and the guarantee of in-house production will be removed except in the case of news and current affairs;
  • a new public service fund will be created to “enhance plurality”;
  • the promotion of greater transparency, including “transparency on the remuneration of talent paid over £450,000”
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll