header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 May 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The same but different

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7700_aamondt

Do the government proposals for future-proofing the BBC lack vision? Athelstane Aamodt reviews the evidence

So it’s finally here: the government has published its white paper on the renewal of the BBC’s Royal Charter, entitled A BBC For The Future: A Broadcaster Of Distinction. It’s big, coming in at 136 (bafflingly, unnumbered) pages, rather more than its predecessor, the 2006 White Paper A Public Service For All: The BBC In The Digital Age, which was almost half the length at 76 pages.

The main points of the white paper are:

  • the licence fee remains intact, and will increase in line with inflation;
  • a new “unitary board” is proposed that would replace the BBC Trust and the BBC Executive;
  • the BBC’s content commissioning will be opened up to greater competition and the guarantee of in-house production will be removed except in the case of news and current affairs;
  • a new public service fund will be created to “enhance plurality”;
  • the promotion of greater transparency, including “transparency on the remuneration of talent paid over £450,000”
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Read All
APIL sees off ‘substantial prejudice’ defence
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll