header-logo header-logo

16 September 2013
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Santander unfair over PIN liability?

Lawyers take issue with the PIN requirements of Santander

Santander may be breaking unfair contract terms regulations with its new security PIN requirement for account holders, lawyers have warned.

Santander UK Plc recently required all its UK account holders to take “reasonable steps” to keep their PIN unique to Santander. The bank may not accept liability if customers ignore this advice.

Writing in NLJ, barrister Stephen Mason and retired solicitor Nicholas Bohm argue that this requirement is so difficult to keep that its terms are unfair. 

“The inability of a human to remember a significant number of unique PINs is directly relevant to the reasonableness of a bank requiring each customer to have a unique PIN for each card (or even each bank),” Mason and Bohm say.

They suggest that both the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and the proposed Directive on Payment Services could apply.

They argue that “considerable” research supports the view that people forget codes quickly and their memory diminishes over time, unless the code is meaningful in some way. Therefore, Santander are not only increasing the risk that customers will write down the PIN but also “throwing the risk onto the customer”.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll