header-logo header-logo

Satellite litigation warning as FRC regime begins

04 October 2023
Issue: 8043 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have called for ‘urgent’ clarity on fixed recoverable costs (FRC), as the much-anticipated regime came into effect

The regime, in place from 1 October, applies to most civil claims valued up to £100,000, with exceptions such as clinical negligence claims below £25,000, mesothelioma claims, abuse cases, claims against the police involving an intentional or reckless tort, and relief or remedy in relation to the Human Rights Act. Housing cases are exempt for two years.

Judges will have discretion to exclude complex cases valued under £100,000.

Changes to Part 36 offers aimed at encouraging parties to settle at an earlier stage have also come into force.

However, Law Society President Lubna Shuja said: ‘There are too many unanswered questions around how the regime will work in practice.

‘The government’s intention with these reforms has been to provide certainty for litigation costs, but the lack of clarity emerging from the reforms will surely lead to years of satellite litigation. At the very least, the government needs to provide further guidance in support of the rules.

‘FRCs are not the same as fixed incurred costs. To set FRCs at levels that do not accurately reflect the broad spectrum of civil litigation, increases the risk of recoverable costs for some cases not being sufficient in relation to the actual costs incurred.’

Michael Young, legal director in professional negligence at Lime Solicitors, urged solicitors to make sure they give clear and prompt advice to clients on the changes to avoid becoming liable for professional negligence.

Young said: ‘It is vital to be ready, as failing to advise with the changes in mind could leave the profession facing a professional negligence time bomb.

‘If solicitors fail to advise their clients on these new changes, they could find themselves liable when claimants end up recovering less costs than they, entirely justifiably, believe they are entitled to.’

He also expressed concern the new regulations ‘would in theory reward a claimant for pushing through to court proceedings instead of exploring a pre-action settlement in greater depth.

‘This outcome would not serve the interests of either claimants or defendants’.

Issue: 8043 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll