header-logo header-logo

Scotch pirates on the rocks?

15 November 2007 / Joanne Flack , James Fry
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

James Fry and Joanne Flack investigate whether new proposals to tighten what is, and is not, Scotch whisky could help to sink the international counterfeiters

For over 50 years, the Scotch whisky industry has been fighting to protect the lucrative Scotch whisky brand against counterfeiters who have sought to associate their products with the name which has become synonymous with quality.

Since the earliest documented record of distilling in Scotland in 1494, the brand has built a strong global reputation for quality which could be easily undermined by the circulation of substandard counterfeit goods.
Strong protection allows exclusive products to be sold at a premium. This is reflected in the value of the Scotch whisky brand, with the value of Scotch whisky exports topping £2.5bn in 2006. With over 70% of the cost of a bottle of Scotch whisky being attributable to taxation, producers are not the only interested parties. VAT and excise duty is worth millions annually to the UK Exchequer, and is set to continue increasing.

The international growth

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll