header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007 / Joanne Flack , James Fry
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Scotch pirates on the rocks?

James Fry and Joanne Flack investigate whether new proposals to tighten what is, and is not, Scotch whisky could help to sink the international counterfeiters

For over 50 years, the Scotch whisky industry has been fighting to protect the lucrative Scotch whisky brand against counterfeiters who have sought to associate their products with the name which has become synonymous with quality.

Since the earliest documented record of distilling in Scotland in 1494, the brand has built a strong global reputation for quality which could be easily undermined by the circulation of substandard counterfeit goods.
Strong protection allows exclusive products to be sold at a premium. This is reflected in the value of the Scotch whisky brand, with the value of Scotch whisky exports topping £2.5bn in 2006. With over 70% of the cost of a bottle of Scotch whisky being attributable to taxation, producers are not the only interested parties. VAT and excise duty is worth millions annually to the UK Exchequer, and is set to continue increasing.

The international growth

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll