header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Scotland the brave

nlj_7659_smith

Roger Smith admires the legal aid administration north of the border

Edinburgh was looking particularly gorgeous during the biennial conference of the International Legal Aid Group (ILAG). The weather was stunning. An extra-curricular visit to the suburb where I spent some of my childhood—now complete with the Robert Louis Stevenson heritage trail— made me particularly mellow. On the other hand, extended contemplation of the fate of legal aid is a bit of a downer for someone now irredeemably English. The detailed proceedings remain veiled under the Chatham House Rules by which the conference was governed. However, the papers and programme are available on ILAG’s website (internationallegalaidgroup.org) and are worth a browse.

Scotland

Not only was Edinburgh out to impress: so too were the Scottish government and the Scottish Legal Aid Board. A generation ago, there was little difference between England and Scotland in its legal aid administration. But, the government north of the border was never so fixated by the grand gestures like compulsory competitive tendering which have so fascinated English

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll