header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Scotland the brave

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
03 July 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7659_smith

Roger Smith admires the legal aid administration north of the border

Edinburgh was looking particularly gorgeous during the biennial conference of the International Legal Aid Group (ILAG). The weather was stunning. An extra-curricular visit to the suburb where I spent some of my childhood—now complete with the Robert Louis Stevenson heritage trail— made me particularly mellow. On the other hand, extended contemplation of the fate of legal aid is a bit of a downer for someone now irredeemably English. The detailed proceedings remain veiled under the Chatham House Rules by which the conference was governed. However, the papers and programme are available on ILAG’s website (internationallegalaidgroup.org) and are worth a browse.

Scotland

Not only was Edinburgh out to impress: so too were the Scottish government and the Scottish Legal Aid Board. A generation ago, there was little difference between England and Scotland in its legal aid administration. But, the government north of the border was never so fixated by the grand gestures like compulsory competitive tendering which have so fascinated English

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
NLJ this week: Does dishonesty always mean strike-off?
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
NLJ this week: Potanin, prenups & privacy
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
NLJ this week: Greed but no fraud in £1.4bn SKAT case
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll