header-logo header-logo

A Scottish divorce?

09 November 2012 / Colin Munro
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Colin Munro examines how we arrived at the referendum stage in Scotland and where we go after the vote

In the next two years, voters residing in Scotland will have the responsibility of deciding whether a union that has lasted over 300 years should continue. The alternative will be a (reasonably) amicable but necessarily complex divorce. The holding of a referendum on Scottish independence and some of its terms was the subject of an agreement between the British government and the Scottish administration, signed by the prime minister and Alex Salmond, the Scottish First Minister, in Edinburgh on 15 October.

How has it come to this? The late Donald Dewar and other architects of the Scotland Act 1998 probably expected that parties supporting the union would always be in the majority in the Scottish Parliament, as did indeed come to pass from 1999 to 2011. However, voters may choose for all sorts of reasons, and constitutional questions may not be at the forefront. At the general election in 2011, the Scottish National Party (with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll