header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Sea of change

To mark the Family Court Reports’ birthday, Jonathan Herring reviews family law cases from the past 20 years

The Family Court Reports (FCR) series, produced fortnightly, has gained an excellent reputation as a reliable, authoritative and up-to-date set of reports of family law cases. Inevitably, on such an anniversary one looks back over the lifespan of the reports. Certainly family law has undergone some significant changes.

CHANGING FAMILY LAW

Gone for sure are the days when a married couple with 2.4 children was the norm for family lawyers. Increasing rates of unmarried cohabitation, formal acknowledgement of same-sex relationships in the Civil Partnerships Act 2004, and greater access to assisted reproductive treatments mean that courts have been getting used to a far wider range of family forms than was once the case.

Other social changes have affected family law too. The increasing significance attached to fatherhood is notable. Groups claiming to represent fathers have in recent years mounted a vociferous campaign claiming that family law and the family courts are “anti-fathers”. Although their claims are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll