header-logo header-logo

Sea of change

24 May 2007 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

To mark the Family Court Reports’ birthday, Jonathan Herring reviews family law cases from the past 20 years

The Family Court Reports (FCR) series, produced fortnightly, has gained an excellent reputation as a reliable, authoritative and up-to-date set of reports of family law cases. Inevitably, on such an anniversary one looks back over the lifespan of the reports. Certainly family law has undergone some significant changes.

CHANGING FAMILY LAW

Gone for sure are the days when a married couple with 2.4 children was the norm for family lawyers. Increasing rates of unmarried cohabitation, formal acknowledgement of same-sex relationships in the Civil Partnerships Act 2004, and greater access to assisted reproductive treatments mean that courts have been getting used to a far wider range of family forms than was once the case.

Other social changes have affected family law too. The increasing significance attached to fatherhood is notable. Groups claiming to represent fathers have in recent years mounted a vociferous campaign claiming that family law and the family courts are “anti-fathers”. Although their claims are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll