header-logo header-logo

Sea of change

24 May 2007 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

To mark the Family Court Reports’ birthday, Jonathan Herring reviews family law cases from the past 20 years

The Family Court Reports (FCR) series, produced fortnightly, has gained an excellent reputation as a reliable, authoritative and up-to-date set of reports of family law cases. Inevitably, on such an anniversary one looks back over the lifespan of the reports. Certainly family law has undergone some significant changes.

CHANGING FAMILY LAW

Gone for sure are the days when a married couple with 2.4 children was the norm for family lawyers. Increasing rates of unmarried cohabitation, formal acknowledgement of same-sex relationships in the Civil Partnerships Act 2004, and greater access to assisted reproductive treatments mean that courts have been getting used to a far wider range of family forms than was once the case.

Other social changes have affected family law too. The increasing significance attached to fatherhood is notable. Groups claiming to represent fathers have in recent years mounted a vociferous campaign claiming that family law and the family courts are “anti-fathers”. Although their claims are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll