header-logo header-logo

20 September 2024 / Jessica Parker
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Media , Judicial review , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Search & seizure: protecting confidential material

189724
What happens when police seize confidential journalistic material following execution of a search warrant? Jessica Parker explains
  • Examines the law relating to the seizure of confidential material following execution of a search warrant.
  • Discusses the case of R (On the Application of LXP) v Central Criminal Court Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2023] EWHC 2824 (Admin), involving the seizure of journalistic material and culminating in judicial review.
  • Highlights the challenge faced by those subjected to searches in seeking to protect confidential material that the investigator had no power to seize.

The law relating to confidential material seized during the execution of a search warrant is likely to interest financial crime lawyers as much as their colleagues at the coalface, given the increasing use of searches by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). There have been more in the past six months than in the previous director’s entire tenure.

A judgment towards the end of last year examined a number of thorny issues arising from the execution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll