header-logo header-logo

20 September 2024 / Jessica Parker
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Media , Judicial review , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Search & seizure: protecting confidential material

189724
What happens when police seize confidential journalistic material following execution of a search warrant? Jessica Parker explains
  • Examines the law relating to the seizure of confidential material following execution of a search warrant.
  • Discusses the case of R (On the Application of LXP) v Central Criminal Court Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2023] EWHC 2824 (Admin), involving the seizure of journalistic material and culminating in judicial review.
  • Highlights the challenge faced by those subjected to searches in seeking to protect confidential material that the investigator had no power to seize.

The law relating to confidential material seized during the execution of a search warrant is likely to interest financial crime lawyers as much as their colleagues at the coalface, given the increasing use of searches by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). There have been more in the past six months than in the previous director’s entire tenure.

A judgment towards the end of last year examined a number of thorny issues arising from the execution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll