header-logo header-logo

20 September 2024 / Jessica Parker
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Media , Judicial review , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Search & seizure: protecting confidential material

189724
What happens when police seize confidential journalistic material following execution of a search warrant? Jessica Parker explains
  • Examines the law relating to the seizure of confidential material following execution of a search warrant.
  • Discusses the case of R (On the Application of LXP) v Central Criminal Court Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2023] EWHC 2824 (Admin), involving the seizure of journalistic material and culminating in judicial review.
  • Highlights the challenge faced by those subjected to searches in seeking to protect confidential material that the investigator had no power to seize.

The law relating to confidential material seized during the execution of a search warrant is likely to interest financial crime lawyers as much as their colleagues at the coalface, given the increasing use of searches by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). There have been more in the past six months than in the previous director’s entire tenure.

A judgment towards the end of last year examined a number of thorny issues arising from the execution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll