header-logo header-logo

Search & seizure: protecting confidential material

20 September 2024 / Jessica Parker
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Media , Judicial review , Fraud
printer mail-detail
189724
What happens when police seize confidential journalistic material following execution of a search warrant? Jessica Parker explains
  • Examines the law relating to the seizure of confidential material following execution of a search warrant.
  • Discusses the case of R (On the Application of LXP) v Central Criminal Court Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2023] EWHC 2824 (Admin), involving the seizure of journalistic material and culminating in judicial review.
  • Highlights the challenge faced by those subjected to searches in seeking to protect confidential material that the investigator had no power to seize.

The law relating to confidential material seized during the execution of a search warrant is likely to interest financial crime lawyers as much as their colleagues at the coalface, given the increasing use of searches by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). There have been more in the past six months than in the previous director’s entire tenure.

A judgment towards the end of last year examined a number of thorny issues arising from the execution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll